Madagascar vs East Timor: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low)
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) over time
- Madagascar
- East Timor
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 2.6 1=low to 6=high against 2.6 1=low to 6=high in East Timor, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 65th and East Timor ranks 65th of 85 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | 2.65 1=low to 6=high | 0.8 1=low to 6=high | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 2.73 1=low to 6=high | 2.53 1=low to 6=high | 0.2 1=low to 6=high | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 2.68 1=low to 6=high | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 0.0833 1=low to 6=high | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, Madagascar or East Timor?
- Madagascar, at 2.6 1=low to 6=high against 2.6 1=low to 6=high in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between Madagascar and East Timor?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and East Timor?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Madagascar and East Timor rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Madagascar ranks 65th and East Timor ranks 65th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.