Papua New Guinea vs East Timor: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low)
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- East Timor
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 2.7 1=low to 6=high against 2.6 1=low to 6=high in East Timor, a difference of 0.1 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 62nd and East Timor ranks 65th of 85 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.88 1=low to 6=high | 2.65 1=low to 6=high | 0.225 1=low to 6=high | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 2.53 1=low to 6=high | 0.37 1=low to 6=high | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 2.73 1=low to 6=high | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 0.1333 1=low to 6=high | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, Papua New Guinea or East Timor?
- Papua New Guinea, at 2.7 1=low to 6=high against 2.6 1=low to 6=high in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
- 0.1 1=low to 6=high, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Papua New Guinea and East Timor rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 62nd and East Timor ranks 65th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.