Which has higher crop residues — direct emissions, Cuba or Latvia?

Cuba, at 0.3095 kt against 0.2993 kt in Latvia as of 2050.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?

34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Latvia: Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O)

Cuba

0.3095 kt

in 2050

Latvia

0.2993 kt

in 2050

Cuba rank

122nd

Latvia rank

123rd

Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

Cuba
Latvia

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.3095 kt against 0.2993 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0.0102 kt.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Cuba ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 123rd of 215 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.1539 kt	0.2368 kt	0.0829 kt	Latvia
2000s	0.1935 kt	0.2595 kt	0.066 kt	Latvia
2010s	0.1928 kt	0.4526 kt	0.2598 kt	Latvia
2020s	0.0909 kt	0.5984 kt	0.5075 kt	Latvia
2030s	0.2323 kt	0.3054 kt	0.0731 kt	Latvia
2050s	0.3095 kt	0.2993 kt	0.0102 kt	Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residues — direct emissions, Cuba or Latvia?: Cuba, at 0.3095 kt against 0.2993 kt in Latvia as of 2050.
What is the difference in crop residues — direct emissions between Cuba and Latvia?: 0.0102 kt, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Cuba and Latvia rank globally for crop residues — direct emissions?: Cuba ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 123rd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Latvia: Crop Residues — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/cuba/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/cuba/latvia/">Cuba vs Latvia: Crop Residues — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 248 places, 14,448 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf