Which has higher crop residues — direct emissions, Eswatini or Jordan?

Jordan, at 0.0219 kt against 0.0212 kt in Eswatini as of 2050.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jordan?

65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Jordan: Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O)

Eswatini

0.0212 kt

in 2050

Jordan

0.0219 kt

in 2050

Eswatini rank

166th

Jordan rank

165th

Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

Eswatini
Jordan

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.0219 kt against 0.0212 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0007 kt.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Eswatini ranks 166th and Jordan ranks 165th of 215 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Jordan	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0148 kt	0.0606 kt	0.0457 kt	Jordan
1970s	0.0187 kt	0.0355 kt	0.0168 kt	Jordan
1980s	0.0197 kt	0.0268 kt	0.0071 kt	Jordan
1990s	0.0194 kt	0.023 kt	0.0036 kt	Jordan
2000s	0.0141 kt	0.0161 kt	0.002 kt	Jordan
2010s	0.0173 kt	0.0208 kt	0.0035 kt	Jordan
2020s	0.0187 kt	0.0229 kt	0.0042 kt	Jordan
2030s	0.0162 kt	0.0196 kt	0.0034 kt	Jordan
2050s	0.0212 kt	0.0219 kt	0.0007 kt	Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residues — direct emissions, Eswatini or Jordan?: Jordan, at 0.0219 kt against 0.0212 kt in Eswatini as of 2050.
What is the difference in crop residues — direct emissions between Eswatini and Jordan?: 0.0007 kt, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jordan?: 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Eswatini and Jordan rank globally for crop residues — direct emissions?: Eswatini ranks 166th and Jordan ranks 165th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Jordan: Crop Residues — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/eswatini/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/eswatini/jordan/">Eswatini vs Jordan: Crop Residues — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 248 places, 14,448 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf