Latvia vs South Sudan: Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O)
Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O) over time
- Latvia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.2993 kt against 0.2857 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0136 kt.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 123rd and South Sudan ranks 124th of 215 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4919 kt | 0.2365 kt | 0.2554 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.5984 kt | 0.2546 kt | 0.3438 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residues — direct emissions, Latvia or South Sudan?
- Latvia, at 0.2993 kt against 0.2857 kt in South Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in crop residues — direct emissions between Latvia and South Sudan?
- 0.0136 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and South Sudan rank globally for crop residues — direct emissions?
- Latvia ranks 123rd and South Sudan ranks 124th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf