Cuba vs South Sudan: Crop Residues — Emissions
Crop Residues — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- South Sudan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.3791 kt against 0.3499 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0292 kt.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 100th and South Sudan ranks 102nd of 183 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.234 kt | 0.2898 kt | 0.0557 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.1114 kt | 0.3118 kt | 0.2004 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residues — emissions, Cuba or South Sudan?
- Cuba, at 0.3791 kt against 0.3499 kt in South Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in crop residues — emissions between Cuba and South Sudan?
- 0.0292 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and South Sudan rank globally for crop residues — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 100th and South Sudan ranks 102nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf