Which has higher crop residues — indirect emissions, Eswatini or Jordan?

Jordan, at 0.0049 kt against 0.0048 kt in Eswatini as of 2050.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jordan?

65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Jordan: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Eswatini

0.0048 kt

in 2050

Jordan

0.0049 kt

in 2050

Eswatini rank

166th

Jordan rank

165th

Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

Eswatini
Jordan

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.0049 kt against 0.0048 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0001 kt.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Eswatini ranks 166th and Jordan ranks 165th of 215 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Jordan	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0033 kt	0.0136 kt	0.0103 kt	Jordan
1970s	0.0042 kt	0.008 kt	0.0038 kt	Jordan
1980s	0.0044 kt	0.006 kt	0.0016 kt	Jordan
1990s	0.0044 kt	0.0052 kt	0.0008 kt	Jordan
2000s	0.0032 kt	0.0036 kt	0.0004 kt	Jordan
2010s	0.0039 kt	0.0047 kt	0.0008 kt	Jordan
2020s	0.0042 kt	0.0052 kt	0.001 kt	Jordan
2030s	0.0036 kt	0.0044 kt	0.0008 kt	Jordan
2050s	0.0048 kt	0.0049 kt	0.0001 kt	Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residues — indirect emissions, Eswatini or Jordan?: Jordan, at 0.0049 kt against 0.0048 kt in Eswatini as of 2050.
What is the difference in crop residues — indirect emissions between Eswatini and Jordan?: 0.0001 kt, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jordan?: 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Eswatini and Jordan rank globally for crop residues — indirect emissions?: Eswatini ranks 166th and Jordan ranks 165th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Jordan: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/eswatini/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/eswatini/jordan/">Eswatini vs Jordan: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 248 places, 14,448 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf