Ecuador vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement, gaps filled

Ecuador
76.74 million tonnes
in 2024
Serbia
77.78 million tonnes
in 2024
Ecuador rank
61st
Serbia rank
60th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement, gaps filled over time

  • Ecuador
  • Serbia
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M191719702024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 77.78 million tonnes against 76.74 million tonnes in Ecuador, a difference of 1.04 million tonnes.

Across all 97 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 60th of 211 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Serbia Difference Ahead
1920s 0 tonnes 132,118 tonnes 132,118 tonnes Serbia
1930s 4,364 tonnes 659,383 tonnes 655,019 tonnes Serbia
1940s 85,052 tonnes 1.45 million tonnes 1.36 million tonnes Serbia
1950s 439,405 tonnes 3.31 million tonnes 2.87 million tonnes Serbia
1960s 1.48 million tonnes 7.35 million tonnes 5.87 million tonnes Serbia
1970s 3.67 million tonnes 16.95 million tonnes 13.29 million tonnes Serbia
1980s 9.55 million tonnes 33.63 million tonnes 24.07 million tonnes Serbia
1990s 19.94 million tonnes 46.19 million tonnes 26.25 million tonnes Serbia
2000s 33.54 million tonnes 56.65 million tonnes 23.11 million tonnes Serbia
2010s 55.55 million tonnes 67.21 million tonnes 11.67 million tonnes Serbia
2020s 72.38 million tonnes 75.19 million tonnes 2.81 million tonnes Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from cement, gaps filled, Ecuador or Serbia?
Serbia, at 77.78 million tonnes against 76.74 million tonnes in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from cement, gaps filled between Ecuador and Serbia?
1.04 million tonnes, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
97 years are reported by both, from 1928 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from cement, gaps filled?
Ecuador ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 60th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-cement-gaps-filled/ecuador/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-cement-gaps-filled/ecuador/serbia/">Ecuador vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 24,125 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement with 90 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.