Cuba vs Vatican: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
Cuba
-0.0025 % change on previous year
in 2024
Vatican
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cuba rank
125th
Vatican rank
124th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Vatican
How they compare
Vatican currently reports 0 % change on previous year against -0.0025 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 0.0025 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 173 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Vatican ahead.
Cuba ranks 125th and Vatican ranks 124th of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 15 and Vatican in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Vatican | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 26.16 % change on previous year | 31.43 % change on previous year | 5.27 % change on previous year | Vatican |
| 1860s | 5.93 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 5.93 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1870s | 4.04 % change on previous year | 2.74 % change on previous year | 1.3 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1880s | 3.08 % change on previous year | 5.88 % change on previous year | 2.79 % change on previous year | Vatican |
| 1890s | 2.5 % change on previous year | 3.68 % change on previous year | 1.18 % change on previous year | Vatican |
| 1900s | 6.04 % change on previous year | 0.303 % change on previous year | 5.74 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1910s | 5.86 % change on previous year | 2.38 % change on previous year | 3.48 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1920s | 4.29 % change on previous year | 0.4598 % change on previous year | 3.83 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1930s | 1.9 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 1.9 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1940s | 3.65 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 3.65 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1950s | 3.39 % change on previous year | -0.9201 % change on previous year | 4.31 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1960s | 3.72 % change on previous year | -2.76 % change on previous year | 6.48 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1970s | 2.55 % change on previous year | -10.68 % change on previous year | 13.23 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1980s | 1.09 % change on previous year | -44.01 % change on previous year | 45.1 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.476 % change on previous year | -13.36 % change on previous year | 13.84 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.1259 % change on previous year | -6.02 % change on previous year | 6.14 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 2010s | -0.1418 % change on previous year | -2.12 % change on previous year | 1.98 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 2020s | -0.0508 % change on previous year | -0.3774 % change on previous year | 0.3265 % change on previous year | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, Cuba or Vatican?
- Vatican, at 0 % change on previous year against -0.0025 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between Cuba and Vatican?
- 0.0025 % change on previous year, with Vatican ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Vatican?
- 173 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Vatican rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 125th and Vatican ranks 124th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.