Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Vatican
Vatican: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate was 0 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
0 % change on previous year
World rank
124th
of 188 countries
All-time high
100 % change on previous year
in 1851
All-time low
-100 % change on previous year
in 1985
Years of data
173
1851–2024
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Vatican, 1851–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Vatican is 0 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Vatican peaked at 100 % change on previous year in 1851 and was at its lowest, -100 % change on previous year, in 1985.
Vatican ranks 124th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Vatican, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1851 | 100 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 50 % change on previous year | -50.0% |
| 1853 | 33.33 % change on previous year | -33.3% |
| 1854 | 25 % change on previous year | -25.0% |
| 1855 | 20 % change on previous year | -20.0% |
| 1856 | 16.67 % change on previous year | -16.7% |
| 1857 | 14.29 % change on previous year | -14.3% |
| 1858 | 12.5 % change on previous year | -12.5% |
| 1859 | 11.11 % change on previous year | -11.1% |
| 1860 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1861 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1862 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1863 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1864 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1865 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1866 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1867 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1868 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1869 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1870 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1871 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1872 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1873 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1874 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1875 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1876 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1877 | 10 % change on previous year | — |
| 1878 | 9.09 % change on previous year | -9.1% |
| 1879 | 8.33 % change on previous year | -8.3% |
| 1880 | 7.69 % change on previous year | -7.7% |
| 1881 | 7.14 % change on previous year | -7.1% |
| 1882 | 6.67 % change on previous year | -6.7% |
| 1883 | 6.25 % change on previous year | -6.3% |
| 1884 | 5.88 % change on previous year | -5.9% |
| 1885 | 5.56 % change on previous year | -5.6% |
| 1886 | 5.26 % change on previous year | -5.3% |
| 1887 | 5 % change on previous year | -5.0% |
| 1888 | 4.76 % change on previous year | -4.8% |
| 1889 | 4.55 % change on previous year | -4.5% |
| 1890 | 4.35 % change on previous year | -4.3% |
| 1891 | 4.17 % change on previous year | -4.2% |
| 1892 | 4 % change on previous year | -4.0% |
| 1893 | 3.85 % change on previous year | -3.8% |
| 1894 | 3.7 % change on previous year | -3.7% |
| 1895 | 3.57 % change on previous year | -3.6% |
| 1896 | 3.45 % change on previous year | -3.4% |
| 1897 | 3.33 % change on previous year | -3.3% |
| 1898 | 3.23 % change on previous year | -3.2% |
| 1899 | 3.12 % change on previous year | -3.1% |
| 1900 | 3.03 % change on previous year | -3.0% |
| 1901 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1902 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1904 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1906 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1907 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1908 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1909 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1910 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1911 | 2.94 % change on previous year | — |
| 1912 | 2.86 % change on previous year | -2.9% |
| 1913 | 2.78 % change on previous year | -2.8% |
| 1914 | 2.7 % change on previous year | -2.7% |
| 1915 | 2.63 % change on previous year | -2.6% |
| 1916 | 2.56 % change on previous year | -2.6% |
| 1917 | 2.5 % change on previous year | -2.5% |
| 1918 | 2.44 % change on previous year | -2.4% |
| 1919 | 2.38 % change on previous year | -2.4% |
| 1920 | 2.33 % change on previous year | -2.3% |
| 1921 | 2.27 % change on previous year | -2.3% |
| 1922 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1923 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1924 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1925 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1926 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1927 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1928 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1929 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1930 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1931 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1932 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1933 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1934 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1935 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1936 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1937 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1938 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1939 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1940 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1941 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1942 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1943 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1944 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1945 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1946 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1947 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1948 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1949 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1950 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1951 | -2.22 % change on previous year | — |
| 1952 | -2.27 % change on previous year | +2.3% |
| 1953 | -2.33 % change on previous year | +2.3% |
| 1954 | -2.38 % change on previous year | +2.4% |
| 1955 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1956 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1957 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1958 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1959 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1960 | -2.44 % change on previous year | — |
| 1961 | -2.5 % change on previous year | +2.5% |
| 1962 | -2.56 % change on previous year | +2.6% |
| 1963 | -2.63 % change on previous year | +2.6% |
| 1964 | -2.7 % change on previous year | +2.7% |
| 1965 | -2.78 % change on previous year | +2.8% |
| 1966 | -2.86 % change on previous year | +2.9% |
| 1967 | -2.94 % change on previous year | +2.9% |
| 1968 | -3.03 % change on previous year | +3.0% |
| 1969 | -3.12 % change on previous year | +3.1% |
| 1970 | -12.9 % change on previous year | +312.9% |
| 1971 | -11.11 % change on previous year | -13.9% |
| 1972 | -12.5 % change on previous year | +12.5% |
| 1973 | -9.52 % change on previous year | -23.8% |
| 1974 | -10.53 % change on previous year | +10.5% |
| 1975 | -11.76 % change on previous year | +11.8% |
| 1976 | -13.33 % change on previous year | +13.3% |
| 1977 | -7.69 % change on previous year | -42.3% |
| 1978 | -8.33 % change on previous year | +8.3% |
| 1979 | -9.09 % change on previous year | +9.1% |
| 1980 | -10 % change on previous year | +10.0% |
| 1981 | -11.11 % change on previous year | +11.1% |
| 1982 | -25 % change on previous year | +125.0% |
| 1983 | -33.33 % change on previous year | +33.3% |
| 1984 | -50 % change on previous year | +50.0% |
| 1985 | -100 % change on previous year | +100.0% |
| 1987 | -100 % change on previous year | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -50 % change on previous year | -50.0% |
| 1989 | -16.67 % change on previous year | -66.7% |
| 1990 | -28.57 % change on previous year | +71.4% |
| 1991 | -22.22 % change on previous year | -22.2% |
| 1992 | -18.18 % change on previous year | -18.2% |
| 1993 | -15.38 % change on previous year | -15.4% |
| 1994 | -13.33 % change on previous year | -13.3% |
| 1995 | -11.76 % change on previous year | -11.8% |
| 1996 | -10.53 % change on previous year | -10.5% |
| 1997 | -4.76 % change on previous year | -54.8% |
| 1998 | -4.55 % change on previous year | -4.5% |
| 1999 | -4.35 % change on previous year | -4.3% |
| 2000 | -8.33 % change on previous year | +91.7% |
| 2001 | -7.69 % change on previous year | -7.7% |
| 2002 | -7.14 % change on previous year | -7.1% |
| 2003 | -6.67 % change on previous year | -6.7% |
| 2004 | -6.25 % change on previous year | -6.3% |
| 2005 | -5.88 % change on previous year | -5.9% |
| 2006 | -5.56 % change on previous year | -5.6% |
| 2007 | -2.63 % change on previous year | -52.6% |
| 2008 | -5.13 % change on previous year | +94.9% |
| 2009 | -4.88 % change on previous year | -4.9% |
| 2010 | -4.65 % change on previous year | -4.7% |
| 2011 | -2.22 % change on previous year | -52.2% |
| 2012 | -2.17 % change on previous year | -2.2% |
| 2013 | -2.13 % change on previous year | -2.1% |
| 2014 | -2.08 % change on previous year | -2.1% |
| 2015 | -2.04 % change on previous year | -2.0% |
| 2016 | -2 % change on previous year | -2.0% |
| 2017 | -1.96 % change on previous year | -2.0% |
| 2018 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2019 | -1.92 % change on previous year | — |
| 2020 | -1.89 % change on previous year | -1.9% |
| 2021 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2022 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2023 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2024 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Vatican changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970 | -312.9% | -3.12 % change on previous year | -12.9 % change on previous year |
| 1982 | -125.0% | -11.11 % change on previous year | -25 % change on previous year |
| 1955 | +100.0% | -2.38 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year |
| 2018 | +100.0% | -1.96 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year |
| 2021 | +100.0% | -1.89 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year |
| 1860 | -100.0% | 11.11 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 31.43 % change on previous year | 11.11 % change on previous year | 100 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1860s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 2.74 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 5.88 % change on previous year | 4.55 % change on previous year | 7.69 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 3.68 % change on previous year | 3.12 % change on previous year | 4.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.303 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 3.03 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 2.38 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 2.94 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.4598 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 2.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.9201 % change on previous year | -2.38 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | -2.76 % change on previous year | -3.12 % change on previous year | -2.44 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | -10.68 % change on previous year | -13.33 % change on previous year | -7.69 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -44.01 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | -10 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1990s | -13.36 % change on previous year | -28.57 % change on previous year | -4.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -6.02 % change on previous year | -8.33 % change on previous year | -2.63 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -2.12 % change on previous year | -4.65 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.3774 % change on previous year | -1.89 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Vatican
- 121 India 0.0181 % change on previous year compare
- 122 United Arab Emirates 0.0089 % change on previous year compare
- 123 Dominican Republic 0.0068 % change on previous year compare
- 125 Cuba -0.0025 % change on previous year compare
- 126 Costa Rica -0.0434 % change on previous year compare
- 127 Switzerland -0.045 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Vatican
- Share of global CO₂ emissions and population 0.0% (2100)
- Share of global CO₂ emissions from land-use change 0.0% (2024)
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change -0.0% (2024)
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change -1,979 tonnes (2024)
- Temperature change with respect to a baseline climatology 2.68 (2024)
- Emissions-weighted carbon price in emissions trading systems 0 constant 2021 US$ per tonne of CO₂ equivalents (2025)
- Emissions-weighted carbon price from carbon taxes 0 constant 2021 US$ per tonne of CO₂ equivalents (2025)
- Carbon price vs. share of global CO₂ emissions covered 0 constant 2021 US$ per tonne of CO₂ equivalents (2025)
- Annual PM2.5 emissions from wildfires 0 tonnes (2026)
- Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change 0 tonnes (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Vatican?
- Cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Vatican was 0 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Vatican?
- The highest recorded value was 100 % change on previous year in 1851.
- What is the lowest cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Vatican?
- The lowest recorded value was -100 % change on previous year in 1985.
- How does Vatican rank for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Vatican ranks 124th out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate rising or falling in Vatican?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Vatican data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 173 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.