Afghanistan vs Suriname: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Afghanistan
1,294 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
1,037 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
152nd
Suriname rank
154th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Suriname
2505007501.0k1.2k196119922023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 1,294 tonnes per square kilometre against 1,037 tonnes per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 257 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 152nd and Suriname ranks 154th of 194 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 1,054 tonnes per square kilometre 291.46 tonnes per square kilometre 762.11 tonnes per square kilometre Afghanistan
1970s 1,144 tonnes per square kilometre 370.36 tonnes per square kilometre 773.45 tonnes per square kilometre Afghanistan
1980s 1,184 tonnes per square kilometre 498.07 tonnes per square kilometre 685.87 tonnes per square kilometre Afghanistan
1990s 1,184 tonnes per square kilometre 639.62 tonnes per square kilometre 544.35 tonnes per square kilometre Afghanistan
2000s 1,200 tonnes per square kilometre 799.38 tonnes per square kilometre 400.35 tonnes per square kilometre Afghanistan
2010s 1,216 tonnes per square kilometre 958.22 tonnes per square kilometre 257.57 tonnes per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 1,266 tonnes per square kilometre 1,032 tonnes per square kilometre 234.29 tonnes per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Afghanistan or Suriname?
Afghanistan, at 1,294 tonnes per square kilometre against 1,037 tonnes per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Afghanistan and Suriname?
257 tonnes per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Suriname rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Afghanistan ranks 152nd and Suriname ranks 154th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Suriname: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/suriname/">Afghanistan vs Suriname: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.