Barbados vs Solomon Islands: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Barbados
8,086 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
7,511 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
80th
Solomon Islands rank
83rd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Solomon Islands
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 8,086 tonnes per square kilometre against 7,511 tonnes per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 575 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 80th and Solomon Islands ranks 83rd of 194 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 10,722 tonnes per square kilometre 1,294 tonnes per square kilometre 9,428 tonnes per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 11,248 tonnes per square kilometre 1,483 tonnes per square kilometre 9,765 tonnes per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 11,604 tonnes per square kilometre 1,944 tonnes per square kilometre 9,660 tonnes per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 11,747 tonnes per square kilometre 2,538 tonnes per square kilometre 9,210 tonnes per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 11,554 tonnes per square kilometre 3,515 tonnes per square kilometre 8,038 tonnes per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 10,128 tonnes per square kilometre 5,608 tonnes per square kilometre 4,520 tonnes per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 8,361 tonnes per square kilometre 7,224 tonnes per square kilometre 1,137 tonnes per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Barbados or Solomon Islands?
Barbados, at 8,086 tonnes per square kilometre against 7,511 tonnes per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Barbados and Solomon Islands?
575 tonnes per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Solomon Islands rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 80th and Solomon Islands ranks 83rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Solomon Islands: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/barbados/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/barbados/solomon-islands/">Barbados vs Solomon Islands: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.