Belarus vs East Timor: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Belarus
25,242 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
25,555 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
27th
East Timor rank
26th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • East Timor
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 25,555 tonnes per square kilometre against 25,242 tonnes per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 313 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 27th and East Timor ranks 26th of 194 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus East Timor Difference Ahead
1990s 24,780 tonnes per square kilometre 19,175 tonnes per square kilometre 5,605 tonnes per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 25,080 tonnes per square kilometre 21,087 tonnes per square kilometre 3,993 tonnes per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 25,234 tonnes per square kilometre 23,274 tonnes per square kilometre 1,960 tonnes per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 25,263 tonnes per square kilometre 25,135 tonnes per square kilometre 128.45 tonnes per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Belarus or East Timor?
East Timor, at 25,555 tonnes per square kilometre against 25,242 tonnes per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Belarus and East Timor?
313 tonnes per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and East Timor?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and East Timor rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 27th and East Timor ranks 26th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs East Timor: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/belarus/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/belarus/timor-leste/">Belarus vs East Timor: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.