Costa Rica vs Cote d'Ivoire: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
44,196 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire
45,986 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
4th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
2nd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Cote d'Ivoire
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 45,986 tonnes per square kilometre against 44,196 tonnes per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 1,790 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 4th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 2nd of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 6 and Cote d'Ivoire in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1960s 27,026 tonnes per square kilometre 22,566 tonnes per square kilometre 4,461 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 33,519 tonnes per square kilometre 25,501 tonnes per square kilometre 8,018 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 41,301 tonnes per square kilometre 29,317 tonnes per square kilometre 11,985 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 42,883 tonnes per square kilometre 32,661 tonnes per square kilometre 10,223 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 43,402 tonnes per square kilometre 34,779 tonnes per square kilometre 8,623 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 44,054 tonnes per square kilometre 39,173 tonnes per square kilometre 4,880 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 44,232 tonnes per square kilometre 44,982 tonnes per square kilometre 750.08 tonnes per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Cote d'Ivoire?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 45,986 tonnes per square kilometre against 44,196 tonnes per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Cote d'Ivoire?
1,790 tonnes per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Cote d'Ivoire?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 4th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Cote d'Ivoire: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/cote-d-ivoire/">Costa Rica vs Cote d'Ivoire: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.