Costa Rica vs Indonesia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
44,196 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
41,212 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
4th
Indonesia rank
7th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Indonesia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 44,196 tonnes per square kilometre against 41,212 tonnes per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 2,984 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 4th and Indonesia ranks 7th of 194 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Indonesia Difference Ahead
1960s 27,026 tonnes per square kilometre 17,501 tonnes per square kilometre 9,525 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 33,519 tonnes per square kilometre 20,247 tonnes per square kilometre 13,273 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 41,301 tonnes per square kilometre 24,138 tonnes per square kilometre 17,163 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 42,883 tonnes per square kilometre 29,044 tonnes per square kilometre 13,839 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 43,402 tonnes per square kilometre 32,255 tonnes per square kilometre 11,146 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 44,054 tonnes per square kilometre 37,637 tonnes per square kilometre 6,417 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 44,232 tonnes per square kilometre 40,792 tonnes per square kilometre 3,440 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Indonesia?
Costa Rica, at 44,196 tonnes per square kilometre against 41,212 tonnes per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Indonesia?
2,984 tonnes per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Indonesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Indonesia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 4th and Indonesia ranks 7th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Indonesia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/indonesia/">Costa Rica vs Indonesia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.