Costa Rica vs Sri Lanka: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
44,196 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
45,472 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
4th
Sri Lanka rank
3rd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Sri Lanka
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 45,472 tonnes per square kilometre against 44,196 tonnes per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 1,276 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 4th and Sri Lanka ranks 3rd of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 27,026 tonnes per square kilometre 26,813 tonnes per square kilometre 213.16 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 33,519 tonnes per square kilometre 31,466 tonnes per square kilometre 2,054 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 41,301 tonnes per square kilometre 33,926 tonnes per square kilometre 7,376 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 42,883 tonnes per square kilometre 35,916 tonnes per square kilometre 6,968 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 43,402 tonnes per square kilometre 38,895 tonnes per square kilometre 4,507 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 44,054 tonnes per square kilometre 43,444 tonnes per square kilometre 609.63 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 44,232 tonnes per square kilometre 45,234 tonnes per square kilometre 1,002 tonnes per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 45,472 tonnes per square kilometre against 44,196 tonnes per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Sri Lanka?
1,276 tonnes per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Sri Lanka rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 4th and Sri Lanka ranks 3rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Sri Lanka: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/sri-lanka/">Costa Rica vs Sri Lanka: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.