Cote d'Ivoire vs Sri Lanka: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
45,986 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
45,472 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
2nd
Sri Lanka rank
3rd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Sri Lanka
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 45,986 tonnes per square kilometre against 45,472 tonnes per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 514 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 2nd and Sri Lanka ranks 3rd of 194 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 22,566 tonnes per square kilometre 26,813 tonnes per square kilometre 4,248 tonnes per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 25,501 tonnes per square kilometre 31,466 tonnes per square kilometre 5,964 tonnes per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 29,317 tonnes per square kilometre 33,926 tonnes per square kilometre 4,609 tonnes per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 32,661 tonnes per square kilometre 35,916 tonnes per square kilometre 3,255 tonnes per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 34,779 tonnes per square kilometre 38,895 tonnes per square kilometre 4,116 tonnes per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 39,173 tonnes per square kilometre 43,444 tonnes per square kilometre 4,271 tonnes per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 44,982 tonnes per square kilometre 45,234 tonnes per square kilometre 251.55 tonnes per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Sri Lanka?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 45,986 tonnes per square kilometre against 45,472 tonnes per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka?
514 tonnes per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 2nd and Sri Lanka ranks 3rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Sri Lanka: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/sri-lanka/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Sri Lanka: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.