Denmark vs Dominican Republic: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Denmark
34,345 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic
33,770 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
11th
Dominican Republic rank
12th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Dominican Republic
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 34,345 tonnes per square kilometre against 33,770 tonnes per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, a difference of 575 tonnes per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 11th and Dominican Republic ranks 12th of 194 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 33,180 tonnes per square kilometre 25,344 tonnes per square kilometre 7,836 tonnes per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 33,710 tonnes per square kilometre 28,836 tonnes per square kilometre 4,875 tonnes per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 33,839 tonnes per square kilometre 31,744 tonnes per square kilometre 2,094 tonnes per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 33,543 tonnes per square kilometre 32,358 tonnes per square kilometre 1,184 tonnes per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 33,232 tonnes per square kilometre 32,988 tonnes per square kilometre 243.96 tonnes per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 33,882 tonnes per square kilometre 33,357 tonnes per square kilometre 525.07 tonnes per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 34,270 tonnes per square kilometre 33,765 tonnes per square kilometre 504.25 tonnes per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Denmark or Dominican Republic?
Denmark, at 34,345 tonnes per square kilometre against 33,770 tonnes per square kilometre in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Denmark and Dominican Republic?
575 tonnes per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Dominican Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Dominican Republic rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 11th and Dominican Republic ranks 12th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Dominican Republic: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/denmark/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/denmark/dominican-republic/">Denmark vs Dominican Republic: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.