Djibouti vs Palestine: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Djibouti
323.19 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
229.64 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Djibouti rank
165th
Palestine rank
166th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Djibouti
  • Palestine
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 323.19 tonnes per square kilometre against 229.64 tonnes per square kilometre in Palestine, a difference of 93.55 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.4 times Palestine's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Palestine ahead.

Djibouti ranks 165th and Palestine ranks 166th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Palestine Difference Ahead
1960s 80.43 tonnes per square kilometre 276.75 tonnes per square kilometre 196.31 tonnes per square kilometre Palestine
1970s 103.06 tonnes per square kilometre 314.31 tonnes per square kilometre 211.24 tonnes per square kilometre Palestine
1980s 139.74 tonnes per square kilometre 404.7 tonnes per square kilometre 264.97 tonnes per square kilometre Palestine
1990s 195.12 tonnes per square kilometre 439.22 tonnes per square kilometre 244.09 tonnes per square kilometre Palestine
2000s 244.59 tonnes per square kilometre 244.92 tonnes per square kilometre 0.3315 tonnes per square kilometre Palestine
2010s 287.79 tonnes per square kilometre 76.55 tonnes per square kilometre 211.23 tonnes per square kilometre Djibouti
2020s 316.85 tonnes per square kilometre 223.04 tonnes per square kilometre 93.81 tonnes per square kilometre Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Djibouti or Palestine?
Djibouti, at 323.19 tonnes per square kilometre against 229.64 tonnes per square kilometre in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Djibouti and Palestine?
93.55 tonnes per square kilometre, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Palestine?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and Palestine rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Djibouti ranks 165th and Palestine ranks 166th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Palestine: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/west-bank-and-gaza/">Djibouti vs Palestine: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.