Ecuador vs Eswatini: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Ecuador
19,362 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
17,272 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
39th
Eswatini rank
41st

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Eswatini
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 19,362 tonnes per square kilometre against 17,272 tonnes per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 2,090 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Ecuador ranks 39th and Eswatini ranks 41st of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 9,891 tonnes per square kilometre 13,175 tonnes per square kilometre 3,284 tonnes per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 11,258 tonnes per square kilometre 14,341 tonnes per square kilometre 3,083 tonnes per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 13,664 tonnes per square kilometre 15,000 tonnes per square kilometre 1,336 tonnes per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 15,750 tonnes per square kilometre 16,129 tonnes per square kilometre 379.15 tonnes per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 18,080 tonnes per square kilometre 16,689 tonnes per square kilometre 1,391 tonnes per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 18,844 tonnes per square kilometre 17,037 tonnes per square kilometre 1,808 tonnes per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 19,374 tonnes per square kilometre 17,250 tonnes per square kilometre 2,124 tonnes per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Eswatini?
Ecuador, at 19,362 tonnes per square kilometre against 17,272 tonnes per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Eswatini?
2,090 tonnes per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Eswatini rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 39th and Eswatini ranks 41st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Eswatini: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/eswatini/">Ecuador vs Eswatini: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.