El Salvador vs Sierra Leone: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

El Salvador
31,793 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
32,425 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
17th
Sierra Leone rank
15th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Sierra Leone
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 32,425 tonnes per square kilometre against 31,793 tonnes per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 632 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 17th and Sierra Leone ranks 15th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 6 and Sierra Leone in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 23,927 tonnes per square kilometre 16,219 tonnes per square kilometre 7,708 tonnes per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 25,622 tonnes per square kilometre 17,293 tonnes per square kilometre 8,330 tonnes per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 28,294 tonnes per square kilometre 18,636 tonnes per square kilometre 9,658 tonnes per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 30,359 tonnes per square kilometre 19,762 tonnes per square kilometre 10,597 tonnes per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 31,634 tonnes per square kilometre 25,531 tonnes per square kilometre 6,103 tonnes per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 31,733 tonnes per square kilometre 31,016 tonnes per square kilometre 716.44 tonnes per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 31,781 tonnes per square kilometre 32,246 tonnes per square kilometre 464.95 tonnes per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, El Salvador or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 32,425 tonnes per square kilometre against 31,793 tonnes per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between El Salvador and Sierra Leone?
632 tonnes per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sierra Leone?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Sierra Leone rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 17th and Sierra Leone ranks 15th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Sierra Leone: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sierra-leone/">El Salvador vs Sierra Leone: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.