Guatemala vs Indonesia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Guatemala
38,562 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
41,212 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
9th
Indonesia rank
7th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Indonesia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 41,212 tonnes per square kilometre against 38,562 tonnes per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 2,650 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 9th and Indonesia ranks 7th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Indonesia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Indonesia Difference Ahead
1960s 17,829 tonnes per square kilometre 17,501 tonnes per square kilometre 328.04 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 19,841 tonnes per square kilometre 20,247 tonnes per square kilometre 405.53 tonnes per square kilometre Indonesia
1980s 23,407 tonnes per square kilometre 24,138 tonnes per square kilometre 730.88 tonnes per square kilometre Indonesia
1990s 28,177 tonnes per square kilometre 29,044 tonnes per square kilometre 866.73 tonnes per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 33,260 tonnes per square kilometre 32,255 tonnes per square kilometre 1,004 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 36,126 tonnes per square kilometre 37,637 tonnes per square kilometre 1,511 tonnes per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 38,156 tonnes per square kilometre 40,792 tonnes per square kilometre 2,636 tonnes per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Guatemala or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 41,212 tonnes per square kilometre against 38,562 tonnes per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Guatemala and Indonesia?
2,650 tonnes per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Indonesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Indonesia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 9th and Indonesia ranks 7th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Indonesia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/indonesia/">Guatemala vs Indonesia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.