Indonesia vs Nicaragua: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Indonesia
41,212 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
36,551 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
7th
Nicaragua rank
10th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Indonesia
  • Nicaragua
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 41,212 tonnes per square kilometre against 36,551 tonnes per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 4,661 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Indonesia ranks 7th and Nicaragua ranks 10th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 3 and Nicaragua in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 17,501 tonnes per square kilometre 21,432 tonnes per square kilometre 3,931 tonnes per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 20,247 tonnes per square kilometre 22,869 tonnes per square kilometre 2,622 tonnes per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 24,138 tonnes per square kilometre 24,820 tonnes per square kilometre 681.24 tonnes per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 29,044 tonnes per square kilometre 28,215 tonnes per square kilometre 829.22 tonnes per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 32,255 tonnes per square kilometre 34,058 tonnes per square kilometre 1,803 tonnes per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 37,637 tonnes per square kilometre 35,808 tonnes per square kilometre 1,829 tonnes per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 40,792 tonnes per square kilometre 36,440 tonnes per square kilometre 4,352 tonnes per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Indonesia or Nicaragua?
Indonesia, at 41,212 tonnes per square kilometre against 36,551 tonnes per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Indonesia and Nicaragua?
4,661 tonnes per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Nicaragua rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Indonesia ranks 7th and Nicaragua ranks 10th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Nicaragua: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/nicaragua/">Indonesia vs Nicaragua: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.