Malawi vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Malawi
13,082 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
12,678 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
62nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
63rd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Malawi
  • Trinidad and Tobago
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 13,082 tonnes per square kilometre against 12,678 tonnes per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 404 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Malawi ranks 62nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 63rd of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 4,222 tonnes per square kilometre 19,250 tonnes per square kilometre 15,029 tonnes per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 6,333 tonnes per square kilometre 18,518 tonnes per square kilometre 12,185 tonnes per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 7,329 tonnes per square kilometre 17,055 tonnes per square kilometre 9,726 tonnes per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 8,409 tonnes per square kilometre 16,022 tonnes per square kilometre 7,613 tonnes per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 10,417 tonnes per square kilometre 14,485 tonnes per square kilometre 4,068 tonnes per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 12,082 tonnes per square kilometre 13,150 tonnes per square kilometre 1,068 tonnes per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 12,934 tonnes per square kilometre 12,735 tonnes per square kilometre 199.27 tonnes per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Malawi or Trinidad and Tobago?
Malawi, at 13,082 tonnes per square kilometre against 12,678 tonnes per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Malawi and Trinidad and Tobago?
404 tonnes per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Malawi ranks 62nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 63rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/malawi/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/malawi/trinidad-and-tobago/">Malawi vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.