Malawi vs United Kingdom: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Malawi
13,082 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
United Kingdom
13,587 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
62nd
United Kingdom rank
60th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Malawi
  • United Kingdom
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 13,587 tonnes per square kilometre against 13,082 tonnes per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 505 tonnes per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 62nd and United Kingdom ranks 60th of 194 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1960s 4,222 tonnes per square kilometre 11,657 tonnes per square kilometre 7,436 tonnes per square kilometre United Kingdom
1970s 6,333 tonnes per square kilometre 11,983 tonnes per square kilometre 5,650 tonnes per square kilometre United Kingdom
1980s 7,329 tonnes per square kilometre 12,168 tonnes per square kilometre 4,839 tonnes per square kilometre United Kingdom
1990s 8,409 tonnes per square kilometre 12,331 tonnes per square kilometre 3,922 tonnes per square kilometre United Kingdom
2000s 10,417 tonnes per square kilometre 12,588 tonnes per square kilometre 2,170 tonnes per square kilometre United Kingdom
2010s 12,082 tonnes per square kilometre 13,237 tonnes per square kilometre 1,154 tonnes per square kilometre United Kingdom
2020s 12,934 tonnes per square kilometre 13,594 tonnes per square kilometre 659.73 tonnes per square kilometre United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Malawi or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 13,587 tonnes per square kilometre against 13,082 tonnes per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Malawi and United Kingdom?
505 tonnes per square kilometre, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and United Kingdom?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and United Kingdom rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Malawi ranks 62nd and United Kingdom ranks 60th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs United Kingdom: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/malawi/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/malawi/united-kingdom/">Malawi vs United Kingdom: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.