Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre

Sweden
5,928 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
5,629 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden rank
97th
Zimbabwe rank
100th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Sweden
  • Zimbabwe
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 5,928 tonnes per square kilometre against 5,629 tonnes per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 299 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Sweden ranks 97th and Zimbabwe ranks 100th of 194 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 6,984 tonnes per square kilometre 1,846 tonnes per square kilometre 5,138 tonnes per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 6,408 tonnes per square kilometre 2,321 tonnes per square kilometre 4,086 tonnes per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 6,003 tonnes per square kilometre 2,933 tonnes per square kilometre 3,071 tonnes per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 5,744 tonnes per square kilometre 3,841 tonnes per square kilometre 1,902 tonnes per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 5,680 tonnes per square kilometre 4,997 tonnes per square kilometre 682.85 tonnes per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 5,775 tonnes per square kilometre 5,591 tonnes per square kilometre 183.07 tonnes per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 5,895 tonnes per square kilometre 5,631 tonnes per square kilometre 263.89 tonnes per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre, Sweden or Zimbabwe?
Sweden, at 5,928 tonnes per square kilometre against 5,629 tonnes per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
299 tonnes per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre?
Sweden ranks 97th and Zimbabwe ranks 100th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/">Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 11,145 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.