Antigua and Barbuda vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP

Antigua and Barbuda
-0.0053 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-0.0017 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Antigua and Barbuda rank
191st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
190th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
-0.100.10.2196019922024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports -0.0017 tonnes per US$ of GDP against -0.0053 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0036 tonnes per US$ of GDP.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 191st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 190th of 193 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s -0.0852 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.038 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.1232 tonnes per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s -0.0389 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.015 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.0538 tonnes per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s -0.0161 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.0023 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.0184 tonnes per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s -0.0097 tonnes per US$ of GDP -0.0006 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.0091 tonnes per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s -0.0078 tonnes per US$ of GDP -0.0014 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.0064 tonnes per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s -0.0065 tonnes per US$ of GDP -0.0018 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.0046 tonnes per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of gdp, Antigua and Barbuda or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at -0.0017 tonnes per US$ of GDP against -0.0053 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of gdp between Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0036 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
48 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of gdp?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 191st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 190th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-unit-of-gdp/antigua-and-barbuda/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-unit-of-gdp/antigua-and-barbuda/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP
Unit
tonnes per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 10,813 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.