Central African Republic vs Nicaragua: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP

Central African Republic
0.3259 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Nicaragua
0.2238 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
6th
Nicaragua rank
9th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Nicaragua
02.557.510196019922024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.3259 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0.2238 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.1021 tonnes per US$ of GDP.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.5 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 6th and Nicaragua ranks 9th of 193 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 1.88 tonnes per US$ of GDP 6.63 tonnes per US$ of GDP 4.75 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
1970s 1.04 tonnes per US$ of GDP 2.17 tonnes per US$ of GDP 1.13 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
1980s 0.4586 tonnes per US$ of GDP 1.29 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.8335 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
1990s 0.4086 tonnes per US$ of GDP 1.37 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.9645 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
2000s 0.3978 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.658 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.2603 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
2010s 0.2927 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.3738 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.0811 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
2020s 0.3236 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.2807 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.0429 tonnes per US$ of GDP Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of gdp, Central African Republic or Nicaragua?
Central African Republic, at 0.3259 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0.2238 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Nicaragua as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of gdp between Central African Republic and Nicaragua?
0.1021 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Nicaragua?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Nicaragua rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of gdp?
Central African Republic ranks 6th and Nicaragua ranks 9th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Nicaragua: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-land-use-change-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/nicaragua/">Central African Republic vs Nicaragua: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, per unit of GDP
Unit
tonnes per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 10,813 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.