Barbados vs Congo: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled

Barbados
57.70 million tonnes
in 2024
Congo
70.59 million tonnes
in 2024
Barbados rank
152nd
Congo rank
149th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled over time

  • Barbados
  • Congo
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M192819762024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 70.59 million tonnes against 57.70 million tonnes in Barbados, a difference of 12.89 million tonnes.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 152nd and Congo ranks 149th of 215 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Congo Difference Ahead
1950s 565,154 tonnes 718,466 tonnes 153,312 tonnes Congo
1960s 2.31 million tonnes 2.96 million tonnes 646,763 tonnes Congo
1970s 6.47 million tonnes 6.60 million tonnes 128,637 tonnes Congo
1980s 12.70 million tonnes 12.47 million tonnes 229,128 tonnes Barbados
1990s 21.36 million tonnes 23.95 million tonnes 2.59 million tonnes Congo
2000s 32.52 million tonnes 32.71 million tonnes 190,010 tonnes Congo
2010s 46.16 million tonnes 49.49 million tonnes 3.33 million tonnes Congo
2020s 55.33 million tonnes 65.73 million tonnes 10.40 million tonnes Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled, Barbados or Congo?
Congo, at 70.59 million tonnes against 57.70 million tonnes in Barbados as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled between Barbados and Congo?
12.89 million tonnes, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Congo?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Congo rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled?
Barbados ranks 152nd and Congo ranks 149th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Congo: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/barbados/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/barbados/congo-rep/">Barbados vs Congo: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 21,826 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil with 86 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.