Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled

Bosnia and Herzegovina
182.29 million tonnes
in 2024
Zimbabwe
165.89 million tonnes
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
118th
Zimbabwe rank
120th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Zimbabwe
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M188519542024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 182.29 million tonnes against 165.89 million tonnes in Zimbabwe, a difference of 16.40 million tonnes.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 117 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 215 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 7 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1900s 0 tonnes 0 tonnes 0 tonnes —
1910s 0 tonnes 0 tonnes 0 tonnes —
1920s 51,342 tonnes 0 tonnes 51,342 tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1930s 256,054 tonnes 0 tonnes 256,054 tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1940s 335,535 tonnes 0 tonnes 335,535 tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1950s 879,880 tonnes 3.04 million tonnes 2.16 million tonnes Zimbabwe
1960s 3.58 million tonnes 12.91 million tonnes 9.33 million tonnes Zimbabwe
1970s 18.52 million tonnes 27.46 million tonnes 8.94 million tonnes Zimbabwe
1980s 47.97 million tonnes 45.00 million tonnes 2.97 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1990s 71.96 million tonnes 70.38 million tonnes 1.58 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 98.29 million tonnes 101.21 million tonnes 2.92 million tonnes Zimbabwe
2010s 138.63 million tonnes 127.99 million tonnes 10.64 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 172.88 million tonnes 156.52 million tonnes 16.35 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Zimbabwe?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 182.29 million tonnes against 165.89 million tonnes in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe?
16.40 million tonnes, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe?
117 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/zimbabwe/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 21,826 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil with 86 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.