Democratic Republic of Congo vs Iceland: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled

Democratic Republic of Congo
154.41 million tonnes
in 2024
Iceland
138.34 million tonnes
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
123rd
Iceland rank
125th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Iceland
050.0M100.0M150.0M192019722024

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 154.41 million tonnes against 138.34 million tonnes in Iceland, a difference of 16.08 million tonnes.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 89 shared years of data; in 1936 it was Iceland ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 123rd and Iceland ranks 125th of 215 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 7 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Iceland Difference Ahead
1930s 0 tonnes 16,833 tonnes 16,833 tonnes Iceland
1940s 0 tonnes 681,937 tonnes 681,937 tonnes Iceland
1950s 4.53 million tonnes 5.56 million tonnes 1.03 million tonnes Iceland
1960s 16.88 million tonnes 16.13 million tonnes 750,040 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1970s 35.81 million tonnes 30.55 million tonnes 5.26 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1980s 60.63 million tonnes 46.67 million tonnes 13.96 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1990s 86.97 million tonnes 64.06 million tonnes 22.91 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 100.59 million tonnes 86.50 million tonnes 14.09 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 120.81 million tonnes 113.06 million tonnes 7.75 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 145.18 million tonnes 132.98 million tonnes 12.21 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled, Democratic Republic of Congo or Iceland?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 154.41 million tonnes against 138.34 million tonnes in Iceland as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled between Democratic Republic of Congo and Iceland?
16.08 million tonnes, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Iceland?
89 years are reported by both, from 1936 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Iceland rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 123rd and Iceland ranks 125th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Iceland: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/iceland/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Iceland: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 21,826 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil with 86 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.