Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled

Democratic Republic of Congo
154.41 million tonnes
in 2024
Zimbabwe
165.89 million tonnes
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
123rd
Zimbabwe rank
120th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Zimbabwe
050.0M100.0M150.0M190319632024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 165.89 million tonnes against 154.41 million tonnes in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 11.48 million tonnes.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 105 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 215 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1920s 0 tonnes 0 tonnes 0 tonnes —
1930s 0 tonnes 0 tonnes 0 tonnes —
1940s 0 tonnes 0 tonnes 0 tonnes —
1950s 4.53 million tonnes 3.04 million tonnes 1.49 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1960s 16.88 million tonnes 12.91 million tonnes 3.97 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1970s 35.81 million tonnes 27.46 million tonnes 8.35 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1980s 60.63 million tonnes 45.00 million tonnes 15.62 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1990s 86.97 million tonnes 70.38 million tonnes 16.59 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 100.59 million tonnes 101.21 million tonnes 620,850 tonnes Zimbabwe
2010s 120.81 million tonnes 127.99 million tonnes 7.18 million tonnes Zimbabwe
2020s 145.18 million tonnes 156.52 million tonnes 11.34 million tonnes Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled, Democratic Republic of Congo or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 165.89 million tonnes against 154.41 million tonnes in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled between Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe?
11.48 million tonnes, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe?
105 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 21,826 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil with 86 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.