Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled

Equatorial Guinea
29.58 million tonnes
in 2024
Eswatini
23.71 million tonnes
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
170th
Eswatini rank
172nd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eswatini
010.0M20.0M30.0M195019872024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 29.58 million tonnes against 23.71 million tonnes in Eswatini, a difference of 5.87 million tonnes.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 170th and Eswatini ranks 172nd of 215 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 2.47 million tonnes 3.08 million tonnes 605,934 tonnes Eswatini
2000s 7.62 million tonnes 9.12 million tonnes 1.50 million tonnes Eswatini
2010s 19.45 million tonnes 15.81 million tonnes 3.64 million tonnes Equatorial Guinea
2020s 27.62 million tonnes 22.00 million tonnes 5.62 million tonnes Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
Equatorial Guinea, at 29.58 million tonnes against 23.71 million tonnes in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
5.87 million tonnes, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 170th and Eswatini ranks 172nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/">Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 21,826 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil with 86 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.