Kazakhstan vs South Africa: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled

Kazakhstan
3.01 billion tonnes
in 2024
South Africa
2.61 billion tonnes
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
32nd
South Africa rank
35th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • South Africa
01.0B2.0B3.0B183019272024

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 3.01 billion tonnes against 2.61 billion tonnes in South Africa, a difference of 399.44 million tonnes.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.

Across all 141 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 32nd and South Africa ranks 35th of 215 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan South Africa Difference Ahead
1880s 1.17 million tonnes 0 tonnes 1.17 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1890s 4.51 million tonnes 0 tonnes 4.51 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1900s 13.00 million tonnes 0 tonnes 13.00 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1910s 21.71 million tonnes 0 tonnes 21.71 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1920s 28.30 million tonnes 0 tonnes 28.30 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1930s 45.47 million tonnes 0 tonnes 45.47 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1940s 75.85 million tonnes 0 tonnes 75.85 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1950s 121.74 million tonnes 35.46 million tonnes 86.28 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1960s 267.44 million tonnes 141.63 million tonnes 125.81 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1970s 630.40 million tonnes 392.03 million tonnes 238.37 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1980s 1.23 billion tonnes 782.77 million tonnes 450.60 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1990s 1.72 billion tonnes 1.19 billion tonnes 526.80 million tonnes Kazakhstan
2000s 2.05 billion tonnes 1.56 billion tonnes 490.75 million tonnes Kazakhstan
2010s 2.50 billion tonnes 2.09 billion tonnes 412.17 million tonnes Kazakhstan
2020s 2.88 billion tonnes 2.50 billion tonnes 380.72 million tonnes Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled, Kazakhstan or South Africa?
Kazakhstan, at 3.01 billion tonnes against 2.61 billion tonnes in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled between Kazakhstan and South Africa?
399.44 million tonnes, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and South Africa?
141 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and South Africa rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled?
Kazakhstan ranks 32nd and South Africa ranks 35th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs South Africa: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/kazakhstan/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/kazakhstan/south-africa/">Kazakhstan vs South Africa: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 21,826 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil with 86 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.