Kazakhstan vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled

Kazakhstan
3.01 billion tonnes
in 2024
Sweden
3.37 billion tonnes
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
32nd
Sweden rank
29th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Sweden
01.0B2.0B3.0B183019272024

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 3.37 billion tonnes against 3.01 billion tonnes in Kazakhstan, a difference of 359.12 million tonnes.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 171 shared years of data; in 1850 it was Sweden ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 32nd and Sweden ranks 29th of 215 countries.

Across the 18 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 7 and Sweden in 10.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Sweden Difference Ahead
1850s 0 tonnes 0 tonnes 0 tonnes —
1860s 3,775 tonnes 9,902 tonnes 6,126 tonnes Sweden
1870s 62,915 tonnes 168,120 tonnes 105,206 tonnes Sweden
1880s 845,189 tonnes 654,272 tonnes 190,916 tonnes Kazakhstan
1890s 4.51 million tonnes 1.83 million tonnes 2.69 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1900s 13.00 million tonnes 4.23 million tonnes 8.76 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1910s 21.71 million tonnes 8.32 million tonnes 13.40 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1920s 28.30 million tonnes 13.96 million tonnes 14.34 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1930s 45.47 million tonnes 32.35 million tonnes 13.12 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1940s 75.85 million tonnes 59.14 million tonnes 16.71 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1950s 121.74 million tonnes 182.31 million tonnes 60.57 million tonnes Sweden
1960s 267.44 million tonnes 555.03 million tonnes 287.59 million tonnes Sweden
1970s 630.40 million tonnes 1.26 billion tonnes 628.20 million tonnes Sweden
1980s 1.23 billion tonnes 1.90 billion tonnes 665.60 million tonnes Sweden
1990s 1.72 billion tonnes 2.35 billion tonnes 631.81 million tonnes Sweden
2000s 2.05 billion tonnes 2.76 billion tonnes 712.98 million tonnes Sweden
2010s 2.50 billion tonnes 3.11 billion tonnes 603.86 million tonnes Sweden
2020s 2.88 billion tonnes 3.32 billion tonnes 440.21 million tonnes Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled, Kazakhstan or Sweden?
Sweden, at 3.37 billion tonnes against 3.01 billion tonnes in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled between Kazakhstan and Sweden?
359.12 million tonnes, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sweden?
171 years are reported by both, from 1850 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and Sweden rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled?
Kazakhstan ranks 32nd and Sweden ranks 29th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/kazakhstan/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-gaps-filled/kazakhstan/sweden/">Kazakhstan vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 21,826 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil with 86 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.