Belarus vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled

Belarus
5.18 billion tonnes
in 2024
Sweden
5.13 billion tonnes
in 2024
Belarus rank
42nd
Sweden rank
44th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled over time

  • Belarus
  • Sweden
02.0B4.0B6.0B183019272024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 5.18 billion tonnes against 5.13 billion tonnes in Sweden, a difference of 49.68 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 171 shared years of data; in 1850 it was Sweden ahead.

Belarus ranks 42nd and Sweden ranks 44th of 215 countries.

Across the 18 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 17.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sweden Difference Ahead
1850s 22,346 tonnes 3.19 million tonnes 3.17 million tonnes Sweden
1860s 225,600 tonnes 10.22 million tonnes 9.99 million tonnes Sweden
1870s 1.45 million tonnes 24.99 million tonnes 23.55 million tonnes Sweden
1880s 5.20 million tonnes 52.99 million tonnes 47.79 million tonnes Sweden
1890s 13.39 million tonnes 101.96 million tonnes 88.57 million tonnes Sweden
1900s 31.65 million tonnes 187.50 million tonnes 155.84 million tonnes Sweden
1910s 58.32 million tonnes 314.95 million tonnes 256.63 million tonnes Sweden
1920s 76.18 million tonnes 429.07 million tonnes 352.89 million tonnes Sweden
1930s 125.00 million tonnes 614.38 million tonnes 489.38 million tonnes Sweden
1940s 227.79 million tonnes 815.15 million tonnes 587.36 million tonnes Sweden
1950s 420.02 million tonnes 1.10 billion tonnes 679.17 million tonnes Sweden
1960s 824.75 million tonnes 1.59 billion tonnes 767.04 million tonnes Sweden
1970s 1.50 billion tonnes 2.38 billion tonnes 884.45 million tonnes Sweden
1980s 2.45 billion tonnes 3.11 billion tonnes 660.53 million tonnes Sweden
1990s 3.41 billion tonnes 3.70 billion tonnes 288.72 million tonnes Sweden
2000s 4.01 billion tonnes 4.26 billion tonnes 253.14 million tonnes Sweden
2010s 4.62 billion tonnes 4.76 billion tonnes 135.06 million tonnes Sweden
2020s 5.07 billion tonnes 5.06 billion tonnes 11.31 million tonnes Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled, Belarus or Sweden?
Belarus, at 5.18 billion tonnes against 5.13 billion tonnes in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled between Belarus and Sweden?
49.68 million tonnes, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sweden?
171 years are reported by both, from 1850 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Sweden rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled?
Belarus ranks 42nd and Sweden ranks 44th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/belarus/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/belarus/sweden/">Belarus vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 23,492 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.