Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Liechtenstein: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
10.63 million tonnes
in 2024
Liechtenstein
9.96 million tonnes
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
188th
Liechtenstein rank
189th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Liechtenstein
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M192619752024

How they compare

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 10.63 million tonnes against 9.96 million tonnes in Liechtenstein, a difference of 666,860 tonnes.

That makes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba's figure about 1.1 times Liechtenstein's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba has been ahead every year.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 188th and Liechtenstein ranks 189th of 215 countries.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
1950s 1.76 million tonnes 11,707 tonnes 1.75 million tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1960s 2.76 million tonnes 201,245 tonnes 2.56 million tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1970s 4.86 million tonnes 1.16 million tonnes 3.70 million tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1980s 6.58 million tonnes 2.57 million tonnes 4.01 million tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1990s 7.47 million tonnes 4.45 million tonnes 3.02 million tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2000s 8.26 million tonnes 6.64 million tonnes 1.62 million tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2010s 9.33 million tonnes 8.58 million tonnes 747,030 tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2020s 10.33 million tonnes 9.70 million tonnes 635,564 tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Liechtenstein?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 10.63 million tonnes against 9.96 million tonnes in Liechtenstein as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Liechtenstein?
666,860 tonnes, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Liechtenstein?
66 years are reported by both, from 1959 to 2024.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Liechtenstein rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 188th and Liechtenstein ranks 189th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Liechtenstein: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/liechtenstein/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Liechtenstein: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 23,492 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.