Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Croatia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.04 billion tonnes
in 2024
Croatia
1.18 billion tonnes
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
82nd
Croatia rank
79th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Croatia
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B188519542024

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 1.18 billion tonnes against 1.04 billion tonnes in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 141.20 million tonnes.

That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 131 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 82nd and Croatia ranks 79th of 215 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia Difference Ahead
1880s 4,513 tonnes 4,927 tonnes 414 tonnes Croatia
1890s 199,570 tonnes 217,910 tonnes 18,340 tonnes Croatia
1900s 1.29 million tonnes 1.41 million tonnes 118,465 tonnes Croatia
1910s 2.99 million tonnes 3.27 million tonnes 274,990 tonnes Croatia
1920s 9.05 million tonnes 9.88 million tonnes 827,328 tonnes Croatia
1930s 21.98 million tonnes 23.88 million tonnes 1.91 million tonnes Croatia
1940s 31.95 million tonnes 34.66 million tonnes 2.70 million tonnes Croatia
1950s 56.16 million tonnes 60.80 million tonnes 4.63 million tonnes Croatia
1960s 109.44 million tonnes 118.46 million tonnes 9.02 million tonnes Croatia
1970s 212.35 million tonnes 230.13 million tonnes 17.78 million tonnes Croatia
1980s 376.62 million tonnes 408.22 million tonnes 31.60 million tonnes Croatia
1990s 528.27 million tonnes 602.26 million tonnes 73.99 million tonnes Croatia
2000s 648.15 million tonnes 805.04 million tonnes 156.88 million tonnes Croatia
2010s 846.10 million tonnes 1.01 billion tonnes 168.31 million tonnes Croatia
2020s 1.00 billion tonnes 1.15 billion tonnes 144.85 million tonnes Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Croatia?
Croatia, at 1.18 billion tonnes against 1.04 billion tonnes in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia?
141.20 million tonnes, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia?
131 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 82nd and Croatia ranks 79th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Croatia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/croatia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Croatia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 23,492 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.