Brazil vs Kazakhstan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled

Brazil
18.20 billion tonnes
in 2024
Kazakhstan
14.94 billion tonnes
in 2024
Brazil rank
19th
Kazakhstan rank
22nd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled over time

  • Brazil
  • Kazakhstan
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B183019272024

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 18.20 billion tonnes against 14.94 billion tonnes in Kazakhstan, a difference of 3.26 billion tonnes.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 169 shared years of data; in 1856 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 19th and Kazakhstan ranks 22nd of 215 countries.

Across the 18 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 7 and Kazakhstan in 11.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1850s 664,430 tonnes 67,838 tonnes 596,592 tonnes Brazil
1860s 3.75 million tonnes 536,767 tonnes 3.21 million tonnes Brazil
1870s 11.19 million tonnes 3.44 million tonnes 7.75 million tonnes Brazil
1880s 21.37 million tonnes 12.38 million tonnes 9.00 million tonnes Brazil
1890s 39.32 million tonnes 31.87 million tonnes 7.45 million tonnes Brazil
1900s 65.21 million tonnes 75.32 million tonnes 10.10 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1910s 105.42 million tonnes 138.77 million tonnes 33.34 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1920s 145.64 million tonnes 181.26 million tonnes 35.63 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1930s 200.62 million tonnes 297.79 million tonnes 97.16 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1940s 262.70 million tonnes 543.16 million tonnes 280.47 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1950s 444.58 million tonnes 1.00 billion tonnes 558.67 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1960s 905.94 million tonnes 1.97 billion tonnes 1.07 billion tonnes Kazakhstan
1970s 1.91 billion tonnes 3.57 billion tonnes 1.67 billion tonnes Kazakhstan
1980s 3.62 billion tonnes 5.81 billion tonnes 2.20 billion tonnes Kazakhstan
1990s 5.87 billion tonnes 8.13 billion tonnes 2.27 billion tonnes Kazakhstan
2000s 9.14 billion tonnes 9.79 billion tonnes 649.41 million tonnes Kazakhstan
2010s 13.56 billion tonnes 12.21 billion tonnes 1.35 billion tonnes Brazil
2020s 17.23 billion tonnes 14.38 billion tonnes 2.85 billion tonnes Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled, Brazil or Kazakhstan?
Brazil, at 18.20 billion tonnes against 14.94 billion tonnes in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled between Brazil and Kazakhstan?
3.26 billion tonnes, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kazakhstan?
169 years are reported by both, from 1856 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Kazakhstan rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled?
Brazil ranks 19th and Kazakhstan ranks 22nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Kazakhstan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/brazil/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/brazil/kazakhstan/">Brazil vs Kazakhstan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 23,492 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.