Congo vs New Caledonia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled

Congo
191.08 million tonnes
in 2024
New Caledonia
171.77 million tonnes
in 2024
Congo rank
131st
New Caledonia rank
134th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled over time

  • Congo
  • New Caledonia
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M195019872024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 191.08 million tonnes against 171.77 million tonnes in New Caledonia, a difference of 19.31 million tonnes.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Congo ranks 131st and New Caledonia ranks 134th of 215 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1950s 747,457 tonnes 2.79 million tonnes 2.04 million tonnes New Caledonia
1960s 2.99 million tonnes 11.54 million tonnes 8.55 million tonnes New Caledonia
1970s 9.42 million tonnes 30.55 million tonnes 21.12 million tonnes New Caledonia
1980s 18.13 million tonnes 47.90 million tonnes 29.77 million tonnes New Caledonia
1990s 35.68 million tonnes 64.28 million tonnes 28.60 million tonnes New Caledonia
2000s 73.13 million tonnes 86.51 million tonnes 13.38 million tonnes New Caledonia
2010s 122.69 million tonnes 122.88 million tonnes 183,830 tonnes New Caledonia
2020s 174.07 million tonnes 161.55 million tonnes 12.53 million tonnes Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled, Congo or New Caledonia?
Congo, at 191.08 million tonnes against 171.77 million tonnes in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled between Congo and New Caledonia?
19.31 million tonnes, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and New Caledonia?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Congo and New Caledonia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled?
Congo ranks 131st and New Caledonia ranks 134th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs New Caledonia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/congo-rep/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/congo-rep/new-caledonia/">Congo vs New Caledonia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 23,492 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.