What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled between Ecuador and Moldova?

32.84 million tonnes, with Ecuador ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Moldova?

133 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Moldova: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled

Ecuador

1.39 billion tonnes

in 2024

Moldova

1.36 billion tonnes

in 2024

Ecuador rank

77th

Moldova rank

78th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled over time

Ecuador
Moldova

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 1.39 billion tonnes against 1.36 billion tonnes in Moldova, a difference of 32.84 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 133 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Moldova ahead.

Ecuador ranks 77th and Moldova ranks 78th of 215 countries.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Moldova	Difference	Ahead
1890s	2,780 tonnes	5.35 million tonnes	5.35 million tonnes	Moldova
1900s	39,670 tonnes	11.69 million tonnes	11.65 million tonnes	Moldova
1910s	361,991 tonnes	21.54 million tonnes	21.17 million tonnes	Moldova
1920s	1.01 million tonnes	28.13 million tonnes	27.11 million tonnes	Moldova
1930s	6.48 million tonnes	46.17 million tonnes	39.69 million tonnes	Moldova
1940s	16.52 million tonnes	84.18 million tonnes	67.67 million tonnes	Moldova
1950s	27.03 million tonnes	155.49 million tonnes	128.46 million tonnes	Moldova
1960s	43.19 million tonnes	306.14 million tonnes	262.94 million tonnes	Moldova
1970s	86.72 million tonnes	557.06 million tonnes	470.34 million tonnes	Moldova
1980s	221.05 million tonnes	907.82 million tonnes	686.78 million tonnes	Moldova
1990s	410.93 million tonnes	1.19 billion tonnes	781.84 million tonnes	Moldova
2000s	654.34 million tonnes	1.26 billion tonnes	606.05 million tonnes	Moldova
2010s	1.01 billion tonnes	1.31 billion tonnes	300.23 million tonnes	Moldova
2020s	1.30 billion tonnes	1.35 billion tonnes	44.49 million tonnes	Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled, Ecuador or Moldova?: Ecuador, at 1.39 billion tonnes against 1.36 billion tonnes in Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled between Ecuador and Moldova?: 32.84 million tonnes, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Moldova?: 133 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Moldova rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled?: Ecuador ranks 77th and Moldova ranks 78th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Moldova: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/ecuador/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/ecuador/moldova/">Ecuador vs Moldova: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled
Unit: tonnes
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 215 places, 23,492 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed: 16 September 2026

Cumulative CO₂ emissions with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.