Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled

Estonia
1.67 billion tonnes
in 2024
Hong Kong, China
1.75 billion tonnes
in 2024
Estonia rank
75th
Hong Kong, China rank
72nd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled over time

  • Estonia
  • Hong Kong, China
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B183019272024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.75 billion tonnes against 1.67 billion tonnes in Estonia, a difference of 81.85 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 82 shared years of data; in 1938 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 75th and Hong Kong, China ranks 72nd of 215 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 9 and Hong Kong, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1930s 59.22 million tonnes 81,771 tonnes 59.13 million tonnes Estonia
1940s 85.84 million tonnes 184,984 tonnes 85.65 million tonnes Estonia
1950s 152.34 million tonnes 9.72 million tonnes 142.62 million tonnes Estonia
1960s 299.20 million tonnes 42.35 million tonnes 256.85 million tonnes Estonia
1970s 542.42 million tonnes 124.49 million tonnes 417.93 million tonnes Estonia
1980s 883.02 million tonnes 300.05 million tonnes 582.96 million tonnes Estonia
1990s 1.19 billion tonnes 588.45 million tonnes 604.89 million tonnes Estonia
2000s 1.37 billion tonnes 967.87 million tonnes 399.63 million tonnes Estonia
2010s 1.54 billion tonnes 1.39 billion tonnes 151.27 million tonnes Estonia
2020s 1.65 billion tonnes 1.68 billion tonnes 35.14 million tonnes Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled, Estonia or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.75 billion tonnes against 1.67 billion tonnes in Estonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled between Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
81.85 million tonnes, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
82 years are reported by both, from 1938 to 2024.
How do Estonia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions, gaps filled?
Estonia ranks 75th and Hong Kong, China ranks 72nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/estonia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-gaps-filled/estonia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 23,492 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.