Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zambia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.5 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zambia
1.51 % change on previous year
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
95th
Zambia rank
94th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Zambia
0255075100189119572024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1.51 % change on previous year against 1.5 % change on previous year in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.01 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Zambia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 95th and Zambia ranks 94th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Zambia Difference Ahead
1950s 0.6044 % change on previous year 34.33 % change on previous year 33.73 % change on previous year Zambia
1960s -0.0453 % change on previous year 6.76 % change on previous year 6.8 % change on previous year Zambia
1970s 1.04 % change on previous year 3.42 % change on previous year 2.38 % change on previous year Zambia
1980s 1.86 % change on previous year 2.39 % change on previous year 0.5266 % change on previous year Zambia
1990s 0.2815 % change on previous year 2.34 % change on previous year 2.06 % change on previous year Zambia
2000s 1.21 % change on previous year 2.86 % change on previous year 1.65 % change on previous year Zambia
2010s 1.81 % change on previous year 2.46 % change on previous year 0.6424 % change on previous year Zambia
2020s 1.63 % change on previous year 1.59 % change on previous year 0.0319 % change on previous year Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1.51 % change on previous year against 1.5 % change on previous year in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia?
0.01 % change on previous year, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia?
74 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 95th and Zambia ranks 94th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zambia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/bosnia-and-herzegovina/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/bosnia-and-herzegovina/zambia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zambia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 20,652 data points, 1851–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.