Brazil vs Kazakhstan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
Brazil
1.52 % change on previous year
in 2024
Kazakhstan
1.49 % change on previous year
in 2024
Brazil rank
93rd
Kazakhstan rank
96th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Brazil
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 1.52 % change on previous year against 1.49 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.03 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 166 shared years of data; in 1859 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 93rd and Kazakhstan ranks 96th of 194 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 14 and Kazakhstan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 34 % change on previous year | 33.75 % change on previous year | 0.2592 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1860s | 13.92 % change on previous year | 13.78 % change on previous year | 0.1384 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1870s | 7.23 % change on previous year | 5.87 % change on previous year | 1.36 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1880s | 7.21 % change on previous year | 3.9 % change on previous year | 3.31 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1890s | 4.62 % change on previous year | 3.06 % change on previous year | 1.56 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1900s | 4.43 % change on previous year | 2.7 % change on previous year | 1.73 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1910s | 4.78 % change on previous year | 2.09 % change on previous year | 2.7 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1920s | 4.15 % change on previous year | 1.68 % change on previous year | 2.47 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1930s | 1.66 % change on previous year | -0.0138 % change on previous year | 1.68 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1940s | 2.6 % change on previous year | 2.86 % change on previous year | 0.2665 % change on previous year | Kazakhstan |
| 1950s | 3.74 % change on previous year | 6.57 % change on previous year | 2.83 % change on previous year | Kazakhstan |
| 1960s | 3.63 % change on previous year | 3.73 % change on previous year | 0.0959 % change on previous year | Kazakhstan |
| 1970s | 3.06 % change on previous year | 2.66 % change on previous year | 0.3993 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1980s | 2.89 % change on previous year | 2.39 % change on previous year | 0.4959 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1990s | 2.69 % change on previous year | 1.27 % change on previous year | 1.43 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 2000s | 2.31 % change on previous year | 0.9067 % change on previous year | 1.41 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.42 % change on previous year | 1.69 % change on previous year | 0.2621 % change on previous year | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 1.53 % change on previous year | 1.47 % change on previous year | 0.0558 % change on previous year | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, Brazil or Kazakhstan?
- Brazil, at 1.52 % change on previous year against 1.49 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between Brazil and Kazakhstan?
- 0.03 % change on previous year, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kazakhstan?
- 166 years are reported by both, from 1859 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Kazakhstan rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Brazil ranks 93rd and Kazakhstan ranks 96th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.