Congo vs Kazakhstan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate

Congo
1.41 % change on previous year
in 2024
Kazakhstan
1.49 % change on previous year
in 2024
Congo rank
99th
Kazakhstan rank
96th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time

  • Congo
  • Kazakhstan
0255075100185919412024

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 1.49 % change on previous year against 1.41 % change on previous year in Congo, a difference of 0.08 % change on previous year.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 99th and Kazakhstan ranks 96th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Kazakhstan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1950s 35.56 % change on previous year 6.7 % change on previous year 28.86 % change on previous year Congo
1960s 2.87 % change on previous year 3.73 % change on previous year 0.8558 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
1970s 0.948 % change on previous year 2.66 % change on previous year 1.71 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
1980s 0.7417 % change on previous year 2.39 % change on previous year 1.65 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
1990s 1.61 % change on previous year 1.27 % change on previous year 0.3413 % change on previous year Congo
2000s 1.67 % change on previous year 0.9067 % change on previous year 0.7661 % change on previous year Congo
2010s 1.72 % change on previous year 1.69 % change on previous year 0.0364 % change on previous year Congo
2020s 1.46 % change on previous year 1.47 % change on previous year 0.0144 % change on previous year Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, Congo or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 1.49 % change on previous year against 1.41 % change on previous year in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between Congo and Kazakhstan?
0.08 % change on previous year, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kazakhstan?
74 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2024.
How do Congo and Kazakhstan rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
Congo ranks 99th and Kazakhstan ranks 96th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Kazakhstan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/kazakhstan/">Congo vs Kazakhstan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 20,652 data points, 1851–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.