Cote d'Ivoire vs Djibouti: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate

Cote d'Ivoire
2.48 % change on previous year
in 2024
Djibouti
2.51 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cote d'Ivoire rank
56th
Djibouti rank
54th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Djibouti
050100150195119872024

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 2.51 % change on previous year against 2.48 % change on previous year in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.03 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Djibouti ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 56th and Djibouti ranks 54th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and Djibouti in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Djibouti Difference Ahead
1950s 42.97 % change on previous year 40.88 % change on previous year 2.08 % change on previous year Cote d'Ivoire
1960s 5.05 % change on previous year 12.51 % change on previous year 7.46 % change on previous year Djibouti
1970s 3.73 % change on previous year 10.11 % change on previous year 6.38 % change on previous year Djibouti
1980s 2.87 % change on previous year 7.48 % change on previous year 4.61 % change on previous year Djibouti
1990s 1.63 % change on previous year 4.21 % change on previous year 2.58 % change on previous year Djibouti
2000s 1.09 % change on previous year 3.3 % change on previous year 2.22 % change on previous year Djibouti
2010s 3.18 % change on previous year 2.5 % change on previous year 0.6726 % change on previous year Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 2.48 % change on previous year 2.52 % change on previous year 0.044 % change on previous year Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, Cote d'Ivoire or Djibouti?
Djibouti, at 2.51 % change on previous year against 2.48 % change on previous year in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between Cote d'Ivoire and Djibouti?
0.03 % change on previous year, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Djibouti?
74 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2024.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Djibouti rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 56th and Djibouti ranks 54th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Djibouti: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/cote-d-ivoire/djibouti/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/cote-d-ivoire/djibouti/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Djibouti: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 20,652 data points, 1851–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.