Czechia vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
Czechia
0.5864 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden
0.6137 % change on previous year
in 2024
Czechia rank
170th
Sweden rank
167th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Czechia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.6137 % change on previous year against 0.5864 % change on previous year in Czechia, a difference of 0.0273 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 164 shared years of data; in 1861 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 170th and Sweden ranks 167th of 194 countries.
Across the 17 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 16 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 34.21 % change on previous year | 7.53 % change on previous year | 26.68 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1870s | 9.33 % change on previous year | 4.79 % change on previous year | 4.54 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1880s | 6.2 % change on previous year | 3.23 % change on previous year | 2.98 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1890s | 5.11 % change on previous year | 2.63 % change on previous year | 2.48 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1900s | 4.08 % change on previous year | 2.38 % change on previous year | 1.7 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1910s | 2.71 % change on previous year | 1.94 % change on previous year | 0.7668 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1920s | 1.8 % change on previous year | 1.57 % change on previous year | 0.2228 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1930s | 1.23 % change on previous year | 1.46 % change on previous year | 0.2316 % change on previous year | Sweden |
| 1940s | 1.39 % change on previous year | 1.07 % change on previous year | 0.3235 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1950s | 2.02 % change on previous year | 1.02 % change on previous year | 0.9988 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1960s | 2.73 % change on previous year | 0.774 % change on previous year | 1.95 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1970s | 3.02 % change on previous year | 1.31 % change on previous year | 1.71 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1980s | 2.47 % change on previous year | 0.8678 % change on previous year | 1.61 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1990s | 1.52 % change on previous year | 0.8504 % change on previous year | 0.6729 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 2000s | 1.14 % change on previous year | 0.8541 % change on previous year | 0.2885 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.9219 % change on previous year | 0.7098 % change on previous year | 0.2121 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.7038 % change on previous year | 0.6184 % change on previous year | 0.0854 % change on previous year | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, Czechia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.6137 % change on previous year against 0.5864 % change on previous year in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between Czechia and Sweden?
- 0.0273 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Sweden?
- 164 years are reported by both, from 1861 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Sweden rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Czechia ranks 170th and Sweden ranks 167th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.