El Salvador vs Guatemala: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
El Salvador
1.08 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guatemala
1.11 % change on previous year
in 2024
El Salvador rank
132nd
Guatemala rank
129th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- El Salvador
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 1.11 % change on previous year against 1.08 % change on previous year in El Salvador, a difference of 0.03 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 154 shared years of data; in 1871 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 132nd and Guatemala ranks 129th of 194 countries.
Across the 16 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and Guatemala in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 32.42 % change on previous year | 27.85 % change on previous year | 4.57 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1880s | 7.02 % change on previous year | 5 % change on previous year | 2.02 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1890s | 3.22 % change on previous year | 2.7 % change on previous year | 0.517 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1900s | 5 % change on previous year | 4.03 % change on previous year | 0.9655 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1910s | 5.08 % change on previous year | 3.81 % change on previous year | 1.27 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1920s | 1.31 % change on previous year | 3.5 % change on previous year | 2.19 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1930s | 1.32 % change on previous year | 5.29 % change on previous year | 3.97 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1940s | 1.35 % change on previous year | 6.6 % change on previous year | 5.25 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1950s | 1.4 % change on previous year | 4.57 % change on previous year | 3.17 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1960s | 0.9848 % change on previous year | 1.55 % change on previous year | 0.563 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 1.48 % change on previous year | 1.52 % change on previous year | 0.0429 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 1.13 % change on previous year | 2.25 % change on previous year | 1.12 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 1.33 % change on previous year | 2.04 % change on previous year | 0.7161 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 1.02 % change on previous year | 1.53 % change on previous year | 0.5097 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.8302 % change on previous year | 1.1 % change on previous year | 0.2679 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0.9434 % change on previous year | 1.1 % change on previous year | 0.1552 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, El Salvador or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 1.11 % change on previous year against 1.08 % change on previous year in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between El Salvador and Guatemala?
- 0.03 % change on previous year, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Guatemala?
- 154 years are reported by both, from 1871 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Guatemala rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
- El Salvador ranks 132nd and Guatemala ranks 129th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.