Eswatini vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate

Eswatini
0.6651 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden
0.6137 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini rank
164th
Sweden rank
167th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sweden
0255075100185119372024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.6651 % change on previous year against 0.6137 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0.0514 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 71 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 164th and Sweden ranks 167th of 194 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sweden Difference Ahead
1950s 30.55 % change on previous year 0.9945 % change on previous year 29.56 % change on previous year Eswatini
1960s 4.54 % change on previous year 0.8637 % change on previous year 3.68 % change on previous year Eswatini
1970s 2.31 % change on previous year 1.31 % change on previous year 0.996 % change on previous year Eswatini
1980s 1.64 % change on previous year 0.8678 % change on previous year 0.7705 % change on previous year Eswatini
1990s 1.74 % change on previous year 0.8504 % change on previous year 0.8937 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s 1.14 % change on previous year 0.8541 % change on previous year 0.2896 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s 0.9111 % change on previous year 0.7098 % change on previous year 0.2013 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s 0.7009 % change on previous year 0.6184 % change on previous year 0.0825 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, Eswatini or Sweden?
Eswatini, at 0.6651 % change on previous year against 0.6137 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between Eswatini and Sweden?
0.0514 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sweden?
71 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Sweden rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
Eswatini ranks 164th and Sweden ranks 167th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/sweden/">Eswatini vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 20,652 data points, 1851–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.