Guinea-Bissau vs Tunisia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate

Guinea-Bissau
2.26 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tunisia
2.23 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
62nd
Tunisia rank
65th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Tunisia
020406080100191719702024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 2.26 % change on previous year against 2.23 % change on previous year in Tunisia, a difference of 0.03 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 62nd and Tunisia ranks 65th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Tunisia Difference Ahead
1950s 31.33 % change on previous year 5.63 % change on previous year 25.69 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
1960s 5.9 % change on previous year 3.16 % change on previous year 2.74 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
1970s 4.66 % change on previous year 3.5 % change on previous year 1.15 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
1980s 5.28 % change on previous year 2.79 % change on previous year 2.5 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
1990s 3.71 % change on previous year 2.94 % change on previous year 0.7709 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
2000s 1.56 % change on previous year 2.93 % change on previous year 1.37 % change on previous year Tunisia
2010s 1.14 % change on previous year 2.8 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year Tunisia
2020s 2.05 % change on previous year 2.29 % change on previous year 0.2444 % change on previous year Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, Guinea-Bissau or Tunisia?
Guinea-Bissau, at 2.26 % change on previous year against 2.23 % change on previous year in Tunisia as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between Guinea-Bissau and Tunisia?
0.03 % change on previous year, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Tunisia?
74 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Tunisia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 62nd and Tunisia ranks 65th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Tunisia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/guinea-bissau/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/guinea-bissau/tunisia/">Guinea-Bissau vs Tunisia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 20,652 data points, 1851–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.